Optimal Solar PV Capacity Planning in Bangka Power System Using Grey Wolf Optimizer

Authors

  • Wahri Sunanda Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Rika Favoria Gusa Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Euis Asriani Department of Mathematics, Universitas Bangka Belitung
  • Firlya Rosa Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33019/

Keywords:

Emission Mitigation, Grey Wolf Optimizer, Power System Optimization, PV Capacity Planning, Solar Photovoltaic

Abstract

This study develops a simplified optimization-based framework to determine the optimal Solar Photovoltaic (PV) capacity for the Bangka power system by combining an annual cost-minimization model with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). Annual electricity demand is supplied by PV and system-level fossil-based generation, while total annual cost comprises annualized PV investment, PV operation and maintenance (O&M), and fossil generation costs. Three scenarios are evaluated: a baseline without PV, a fixed-PV capacity of 50 MW, and a GWO-optimized PV capacity bounded between 0 and 150 MW. The calculations and GWO procedure are implemented in Python 3.10 using 30 wolves, 100 iterations, and 20 independent runs. All runs converge to the upper feasible capacity of 150 MW. At this capacity, PV generation reaches 236.52 GWh/year, representing 15.6% of annual electricity demand, compared with 78.84 GWh/year or 5.2% in the fixed-PV scenario. Fossil generation cost decreases from 181.73 to 153.35 million USD/year. After including 13.75 million USD/year in annualized PV investment and 2.25 million USD/year in PV O&M costs, the total annual system cost reaches 169.35 million USD/year, yielding net savings of approximately 12.38 million USD/year relative to the baseline. Annual CO2 emissions decrease from 1211.54 to 1022.32 ktCO2/year, corresponding to a reduction of approximately 189.22 ktCO2/year. Within the adopted annual model assumptions, the 150 MW configuration provides the lowest cost and emissions among the evaluated alternatives and represents a boundary optimum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] P. X. Hoa, V. N. Xuan, and N. T. P. Thu, “Factors affecting carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable development goals – New insights into six asian developed countries,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 21, p. e39943, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39943.

[2] W. Sunanda, M. I. B. Setyonegoro, S. P. Hadi, and Sarjiya, “Optimizing power sector decarbonization in Indonesia through an integrated policy modeling framework,” Green Technologies and Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 100276, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.grets.2025.100276.

[3] R. Gh. Alajmi, “Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study of Saudi Arabia,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 5496, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16135496.

[4] D. Ochoa-Correa, P. Arévalo, and S. Martinez, “Pathways to 100% Renewable Energy in Island Systems: A Systematic Review of Challenges, Solutions Strategies, and Success Cases,” Technologies, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 180, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/technologies13050180.

[5] PLN Unit Induk Wilayah Bangka Belitung, Perencanaan dan Integrasi SMR dengan Sistem Ketenagalistrikan Bangka Belitung, Bangka Belitung, Indonesia, Nov. 2025.

[6] Y. Tiandho, I. Dinata, W. Sunanda, R. F. Gusa, and D. Novitasari, “Solar energy potential in Bangka belitung islands, Indonesia,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 257, p. 012022, May 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/257/1/012022.

[7] L. Micheli, A. Soria-Moya, D. L. Talavera, B. Abbasi, and E. F. Fernández, “Energy and economic implications of photovoltaic curtailment: current status and future scenarios,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 81, p. 104414, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2025.104414.

[8] E. H. Sepúlveda-Oviedo, “A review of operational factors affecting photovoltaic system performance,” Energy Conversion and Management: X, vol. 26, p. 100942, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100942.

[9] T. S. Kishore, P. U. Kumar, and V. Ippili, “Review of global sustainable solar energy policies: Significance and impact,” Innovation and Green Development, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 100224, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2025.100224.

[10] J.-K. Kim, H. Park, S.-j. Kim, J. Lee, Y. Song, and S. C. Yi, “Optimization models for the cost-effective design and operation of renewable-integrated energy systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 183, p. 113429, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113429.

[11] P. K. Mandal, “A review of classical methods and Nature-Inspired Algorithms (NIAs) for optimization problems,” Results in Control and Optimization, vol. 13, p. 100315, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rico.2023.100315.

[12] H. Rezk, A. Ghani Olabi, T. Wilberforce, and E. Taha Sayed, “Metaheuristic optimization algorithms for real-world electrical and civil engineering application: A review,” Results in Engineering, vol. 23, p. 102437, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102437.

[13] X. Lu, Y. Guan, J. Liu, W. Yang, J. Sun, and J. Dai, “Research on Real-Time Prediction Method of Photovoltaic Power Time Series Utilizing Improved Grey Wolf Optimization and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network,” Processes, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1578, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/pr12081578.

[14] M. Nasir, A. Sadollah, S. Mirjalili, S. A. Mansouri, M. Safaraliev, and A. Rezaee Jordehi, “A Comprehensive Review on Applications of Grey Wolf Optimizer in Energy Systems,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2279–2319, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11831-024-10214-3.

[15] C. Berna-Escriche, L. Alvarez-Piñeiro, D. Blanco, and Y. Rivera, “Multi-objective optimization of hydro-wind-solar generation: A path towards total economy decarbonization with external energy independence in small stand-alone grids,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 114, p. 115695, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.115695.

[16] Danish Energy Agency (DEA), Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR), Embassy of Denmark (ED), and Ea Energy Analyses (EA), Technology Data for the Indonesian Power Sector—Catalogue for Generation and Storage of Electricity. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2024. [Online]. Available: Technology Data for the Indonesian Power Sector—Catalogue for Generation and Storage of Electricity.

[17] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Emission Factor Database,” 2025, with minor processing by Our World in Data. “Carbon dioxide emission factors” dataset. Accessed: May 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: Carbon dioxide emission factors dataset.

[18] K. Choubineh, H. Yousefi, and M. Moeini-Aghtaie, “Expansion planning studies of generation sector in highly renewable energy systems considering flexibility requirements,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 170, p. 110922, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110922.

Downloads

Published

18.10.2026

How to Cite

[1]
W. Sunanda, R. F. Gusa, E. Asriani, and F. Rosa, “Optimal Solar PV Capacity Planning in Bangka Power System Using Grey Wolf Optimizer”, JurnalEcotipe, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 321–330, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.33019/.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2