ANALYSIS OF TRANSFER RATE WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK WITH STANDARDS IEEE 802.11A AND IEEE 802.11G ON THE KANAL LINE OF SIGHT
Abstract
WiFi works on the 2.4 GHz band and 5 GHz. WiFi standard that works at this frequency, among others IEEE802.11g and IEEE802.11a. In this study measured the download and upload transfer rate of data with standard IEEE802.11g and IEEE802.11a. Measurements carried out on the canal Line of Sight (LOS), using two laptops to connected with the Access Point (AP) standard IEEE802.11g and IEEE802.11a. The results were obtained, the IEEE802.11g standard, download and upload transfer rate highest data 2.662,54.KB / s and 2549.60 KB / s, and the lowest 484,50.KB / s and 477.40 KB / s, while the IEEE802.11a standard, the transfer rate of the highest data download and upload 8104.68 KB / s and 5744.24 KB / s, and the lowest was 872.24 KB / s and 465,38.KB / s. In IEEE802.11g standard, the transfer rate of download and upload data at the lowest signal to below 35% and 30%, of the transfer rate of data downloads and uploads the highest. In the IEEE802.11a standard, the transfer rate of download and upload data at the lowest signal quality to below 20% and 30%, of the transfer rate of data downloads and uploads the highest. Data download transfer rate capability Standard IEEE802.11a, 2-3 times better at the highest signal quality condition, and no more than 2 times the lowest signal quality condition, compared the ability of downloading data transfer rate standard IEEE802.11g. The ability of data transfer upload rate IEEE802.11a Standard, 1.4 to 3 times better in the conditions of the highest quality signal, and 1-3 times better at low signal quality conditions, than the ability to upload the data transfer rate standard IEEE802.11g.
Downloads
References
[2] De Carvalho, J.A.R. Pachecho, H. Veiga, C.F. Riberieo Pacheco, A.D. Reis. (2012). “Performance Evaluation of Laboratory Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11g WPA Point-to-Point Links Using RCP, UDP, and FTP”. International Conference on Health and Social Care
Information System and Technologies. V. Portugal, hal: 302-309.
[3] Khanduri, Rachana, dan S.S. Rattan. (2013). “Performance Comparison Analysis Between IEEE 802.11a/g/b/n Standards”. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887). I. Dehradun, hal. 13-20.
[4] P. Sharma, R.K.Chaurasiya, Anuj Saxena. (2013). “Comparison analysis between IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n”. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. Vol. 4, Issue 5, hal.988.
[5] Sinaga, Sony Bahagia. (2012). “Analisa Perbandingan Kecepatan Transfer Data menggunakan Kabel UTP dan WiFi dengan Metode Stop and Wait Automatic Repeat Request”. Pelita Informatika Budi Dharma. II. (Medan, Desember 2012: 45-50)
[6]. Sudharshan Vazkhudai, Jennifer M. Schopf, Ian Foster. “Predicting the Performance of Wide Area Data Transfer”. (Chicago).
[7] Anonymous. 2015. Understanding Wi-Fi “Signal Strength vs. Wi-Fi Speed”. http://www.theruckusroom.net/2015/05/all-other-factors-of-which-there-are-many-being-equal-stronger-signal-strength-is-correlated-with-higher-data-transfer-
sp.html. Download Juni 2015.
[8] Omueti, Modupe, dan Ljiljana. “Effect of Transfer File Size on TCP-AdaLR Performance A Simulation Study”. (Canada).
Copyright in each article is the property of the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Jurnal Ecotipe (Electronic, Control, Telecommunication, Information, and Power Engineering) has the right to publish for the first time with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The author can enter the writing separately, regulate the non-exculsive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (for example: sent to the author's institution respository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript was first published in the Jurnal Ecotipe (Electronic, Control, Telecommunication, Information, and Power Engineering);
