FUZZY SIMPLE ADDICTIVE WEIGHTING DECISION MODEL IN THE SELECTION OF ELECTRONIC GOODS IN ILTIZAM LHOKSEUMAWE

  • Muhammad Sadli Department of Electrical Engineering University of Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe

Abstract

Docking electronic devices with information technology has been growing very rapidly both with notebook brand, price and specifications of various kinds. Notebook particular laptop has been progressing quite rapidly at this time. Both in terms of hardware, software, and design and specifications offered. This can be demonstrated by the high sales results Notebook in stores Lhokseumawe. Consumers today are not motivated by only one kind of note book in circulation, but can choose more than one in choosing and have the electronic devices. Based on the number of products presented to consumers, ranging from the brand, the hardware specifications, the types of notebooks, and functional from the notebook, consumers are confused when assigning a laptop to be purchased. This shows that when buying a notebook should be tailored to the needs of consumers. the criteria used is the price, screen, processor, vga, memory and hard drive. Difuzzifikasi value is the price. Process models fuzzification stage is inclusion criterion value, the value fuzzification price and value are not in fuzzifikaasi, the second stage of calculating the value of the normalization matrix, revenue weight value, and the final calculation of the value of the preference. The results of the model simple addictive fuzzy weighting in the selection of electronic goods is the highest value of each consumer in choosing a notebook electronic goods.

Keywords: Decision Support Systems, Election Notebook, Fuzzy, SAW

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8, 338-353.
[2] Kusumadewi, Sri., Hartati, Sri., Harjoko, Agus., Wardoyo, Retantyo., 2006, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM), Penerbit Graha ilmu, yogyakarta.
[3] Frans Susilo S. J. (2006). “Himpunan dan logika kabur serta Aplikasi”. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.
[4] Sri Kusumadewi (2004). Aplikasi Logika Fuzzy Untuk sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Edisi Pertama, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[5] Sutojo, T. & Edi Mulyanto (2011). Kecerdasan Buatan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
[6] Wibowo, Henri. Dkk. 2009. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Penerima Beasiswa Bank BRI Menggunakan FMADM. Jurusan Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.
[7] Kusumadewi, Sri. (2006). Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making.Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[8] Kusrini, 2007, Konsep Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, ANDI, Yogyakarta.
[9] Dadan Umar Daihani, 2001, Komputerisasi Pengambilan Keputusan, Penerbit Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
[10] Turban Efraim, 2005, Decision Support System And Intelligent System, ANDI, Yogyakarta.
[11] Gavish, B., dan Gerdes, J.H., 1997, Voting mechanisms and their implications in a GDSS environment, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 71, 1997, pp. 41-74, http://www.springerlink.com/content/q0v8970v55qq2851/, diakses 12 Mei 2014.
[12] Jogianto, H.M. 2005. Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi : Pendekatan Terstruktur Teori dan Praktik Aplikasi Bisnis. Edisi Ketiga. Andi. Yogyakarta.
[13] Turban., E., Aronson, J.E., dan Liang, T.P., 2005, Decision Support System and Intellegent System, 7th (Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas Jilid 1), Dwi Prabantini, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
Published
2016-10-26
How to Cite
[1]
M. Sadli, “FUZZY SIMPLE ADDICTIVE WEIGHTING DECISION MODEL IN THE SELECTION OF ELECTRONIC GOODS IN ILTIZAM LHOKSEUMAWEâ€, JurnalEcotipe, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 17-25, Oct. 2016.
Abstract viewed = 702 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 668 times